Game of the Month and Code of Conduct revision

Discussion in 'News - Front Page Posts' started by Brownmccoy, Sep 15, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dash

    dash Guest

    I THINK that has been addressed in the newer version.
     
  2. Heres a good idea, you say unsupported divisions have no CO, well heres my thinking: Unsupported divisions are unsupported for a reason; have that division follow all guidelines of XoO community as well as have a CO. Heres the idea, CO's in every game get Xenate from what seems to be the case, in the unsupported the CO cannot be a Xenate member until supported.

    Have a incentive for that CO to make the game supported by either bringing in new recruits or getting existing ones, it will step up leadership and possibly bring a new game to XoO that represents.

    So summarize it up, CO's that lead unsupported games that want to get supported need to step up their game and do w/e it takes to make that division strong to support. This leaves XoO community rules intact and it also represents us in other games that we dont focus on.

    I think its a good idea =]

    Oh, and bitching about not being on TS..... ROFLCOPTER you should just leave this community, like DASH says "Heres the door ---------->". Get on or leave the community. Jesus Christ some people act as if we want your kidney or something...
     
  3. I actually do want people's kidneys.








    But that's neither here nor there.
     
  4. Then game leaders can easily make a channel, "quiet but here channel" like I have done for League of Legends. It gives game leaders a better idea also who of their members are staying active in all aspects of XoO.

    Also to my knowledge the mandatory rule only applies to Supported division. I hope this clears some things up.
     
  5. I didn't read that wall of text but what parts of it I did, it seems like you misinterpreted everything i said. not using anything as an excuse. OTHER PEOPLE dont always visit every day.

    my problem is not related to the issue that was supposedly fixed. i only asked a simple question so i could try and fix it by going back. i doubt anyone here could solve it since i already asked developers and they were like: I DUNNO LOL. DID YOU TRY THE NEW VERSION? but regardless i DID ask here.

    its not either i am in ts or a game, its if i go on ts it either crashes right away or very soon thus i don tWANT to start a game that i know will be lost. and if i game i get questions like WHY ARENT YOU ON TS?
     
  6. Ok you definately did not get my meaning then. I never said anything about not liking/wanting to get on ts. I never had any problems with it and always have been on WHEN I AM ABLE TO.
     
  7. I think lines just got crossed cause you kept mentioning other members who don't get on the forums or TS because of issues.



    I don't think I've ever had an issue with terror not getting on TS when playing BC2.
     
  8. Global Agenda. It's F2P and comes with a free trial.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.