I hope this is viable. This is the first Ive heard, I want to hear more. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110119102746.htm
The only problems are that it requires 3,000 degrees fahrenheit to work, it's less than 1% efficient and it wouldn't actually reduce carbon production.
Well one could argue that if it's put to widespread use, then less coal plants would be needed because the reactor would double the output of used ones. But still, way too far in the future, we need something more immediate.